(zhn)现在的位置Q?/strong> 跨考网公共?/a>p作文正文

考研最后一周:(x)2014考研p二作文预(19Q_跨考网

最后更新时_(d)(x)2013-12-30 22:10:40
辅导评Q?a target="_blank" rel="nofollow">暑期集训 在线咨询
复习(fn)紧张Q焦头烂额?逆风轻袭Q来跨考秋季集训营Q帮你寻Ҏ(gu)Q定Ҏ(gu)Q?/span> ?jin)解一?>

?/span>  作文要求Q?/strong>

  Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

  范文Q?/strong>

  Some communities have decided to base evaluations of teachers on students? test scores. It’s these evaluations that determine how much teachers will be paid. I don’t think this is a very good idea for several reasons.

  First of all, if teachers?salaries are going to be based on how much students learn, then some teachers will start to teach their students only what they need to get high test scores. This means that students will miss out on a lot of education that can’t be measured on a test.

  For instance, one of the best methods to help students understand a subject is encouraging them to discuss it. A common practice is to divide the class into groups, have each group discuss the subject, and then have them report back to the whole class. This kind of shared learning can lead to a fuller understanding. It also teaches students how to discuss and debate ideas. However, it doesn’t supply facts to show off on a test.

  Another problem with basing teachers?salaries on how much their students learn is that teachers may ignore students who have learning difficulties. Some students learn more slowly than others and need more personal attention. If a teacher is worried about tests, he may feel he has to push the majority of the students to cram facts. That effort will take all his time. He won’t be able to help the less able students.

  It’s true there are teachers who “burn out?after many years teaching and just don’t care how much their students learn. Basing their salaries on their students?test scores may improve their efforts. However, it’s not fair for the majority of teachers. They deserve and need to be judged by other criteria.

  2014考研p二作文预及(qing)模版

  2014考研p作文万能模板汇?/strong>

  历年考研p作文题目?qing)范文模版汇?/a>

跨考考研评

班型 定向班型 开班时?/td> 高定?/td> 标准?/td> 评介绍 咨询
U季集训 冲刺?/td> 9.10-12.20 168000 24800?/td> 班面授+专业??+专业译֮向辅?协议加强评(高定?+专属规划{疑(高定?+_化答?复试资源(高定?+复试译֌(高定?+复试指导(高定?+复试班主?v1服务(高定?+复试面授密训(高定?+复试1v1(高定?
2023集训畅学 非定向(政英?数政qQ?/td> 每月20?/td> 22800?协议? 13800?/td> 先行阶在U课E?基础阶在U课E?强化阶在U课E?真题阶在U课E?冲刺阶在U课E?专业NҎ(gu)一对一评+班主dE督学服?全程规划体系+全程试体系+全程_化答?择校择专业能力定位体p?全年关键环节指导体系+初试加强?初试专属服务+复试全科标准班服?/td>

①凡本网注明“稿件来源:(x)跨考网”的所有文字、图片和韌频稿Ӟ版权均属北京学博教育咨询有限公司Q含本网和跨考网Q所有,M媒体、网站或个h未经本网协议授权不得转蝲、链接、{帖或以其他Q何方式复制、发表。已l本|协议授权的媒体、网站,在下载用时必须注明“稿件来源,跨考网”,q者本|将依法q究法律责Q?/p>

②本|未注明“稿件来源:(x)跨考网”的?囄Eg均ؓ(f)转蝲E,本网转蝲仅基于传递更多信息之目的Qƈ不意味着再通{载稿的观Ҏ(gu)证实其内容的真实性。如其他媒体、网站或个h从本|下载用,必须保留本网注明的“稿件来源”,q自负版权等法律责Q。如擅自改为“稿件来源:(x)跨考网”,本网依法追I法律责仅R?/p>

③如本网转蝲E涉?qing)版权等问题Q请作者见E后在两周内速来?sh)与跨考网联系Q电(sh)话:(x)400-883-2220