您現(xiàn)在的位置: 跨考網(wǎng)公共課英語真題正文

2015考研英語二閱讀理解二真題

最后更新時間:2015-07-28 13:29:40
輔導課程:暑期集訓 在線咨詢
復(fù)習緊張,焦頭爛額?逆風輕襲,來跨考秋季集訓營,幫你尋方法,定方案! 了解一下>>

  2015年考研時間為12月27-28日,2016年考研時間會提前一周。時間跨度縮短,意味著在更短的時間內(nèi)要投入更多的精力。今天就為大家獻上2015年考研英語二真題,大家抓緊時間做一做,對其中不認識的單詞再背一背。

  Text 2

  For years, studies have found that first-generation college student – those who do not have a parent with a college degree – lag other students on a range of education achievement factors. Their grades are lower than and their dropout rates are higher. But since such students are most likely to advance economically if they succeed in higher education, colleges and universities have pushed for decades to recruit more of them. This has created “a paradox” in that recruiting first-generation student, but then watching many of them fail, means that higher education has “continued to reproduce and widen, rather than close.” An achievement gap based on social class, according to the depressing beginning of a paper forthcoming in the journal Psychological Science.

  But the article is actually quite optimistic, as it outlines a potential solution to this problem, suggesting that an approach (which involves a one-hour, next-to-no-cost program) can close 63 percent of the achievement gap (measured by such factors as grades) between first-generation and other students.

  The authors of the paper are from different universities, and their findings are based on a study involving 147 students (who completed the project) at an unnamed private university. First generation was defined as not having parent with four-year college degree. Most of the first-generation students (59.1 percent) were recipients of Pell Grants, a federal grant of undergraduates with financial need, while this was true only for 8.6 percent of the students with at least one parent with four-year degree.

  Their thesis – that a relatively modest intervention could have a big impact – was based on the view that first-generation students may be most lacking not in potential but in practical knowledge about how to deal with the issues that face most college students. They cite past research by several authors to show that this is the gap that must be narrowed to close the achievement gap.

  Many first-generation students “struggled to navigate the middle-class culture of higher education, learn the ‘rules of the game,’ and take advantage of college resources,” they write. And this becomes more of a problem when colleges don’t talk about the class advantages and disadvantages of different groups of students. Because US colleges and universities seldom acknowledge how social class can affect students’ educational experiences, many first-generation students lack of sight about why they are struggling and do not understand students ‘like them’ can improve.”

  26. Recruiting more first-generation students has .

  [A]. reduced their dropout rates

  [B]. narrowed the achievement gap

  [C]. missed its original purpose

  [D]. depressed college students

  27. The author of the research article are optimistic because .

  [A]. the problem is solvable

  [B]. their approach is costless

  [C]. the recruiting rate has increased

  [D]. their findings appeal to students

  28. The study suggests that most first-generation students .

  [A]. study at private universities

  [B]. are from single-parent families

  [C]. are in need of financial support

  [D]. have failed their college

  29. The author of the paper believe that first-generation students .

  [A]. are actually indifferent to the achievement gap

  [B]. can have a potential influence on other projects

  [C]. may lack opportunities to apply research projects

  [D]. are inexperienced in handling their issues at college

  30. We may infer from the last paragraph that .

  [A]. universities often reject the culture of their middle-class

  [B]. students are usually to blame for their lack of resources

  [C]. social class greatly helps enrich educational experiences.

  [D].colleges are partly responsible for the problem in question

  酷暑不約而至,最好的心靜方法就是做歷年考研真題,不信的話,你可以試試。做完題后的感覺還是挺棒的,加油哦,考生們!

 

跨考考研課程

班型 定向班型 開班時間 高定班 標準班 課程介紹 咨詢
秋季集訓 沖刺班 9.10-12.20 168000 24800起 小班面授+專業(yè)課1對1+專業(yè)課定向輔導+協(xié)議加強課程(高定班)+專屬規(guī)劃答疑(高定班)+精細化答疑+復(fù)試資源(高定班)+復(fù)試課包(高定班)+復(fù)試指導(高定班)+復(fù)試班主任1v1服務(wù)(高定班)+復(fù)試面授密訓(高定班)+復(fù)試1v1(高定班)
2023集訓暢學 非定向(政英班/數(shù)政英班) 每月20日 22800起(協(xié)議班) 13800起 先行階在線課程+基礎(chǔ)階在線課程+強化階在線課程+真題階在線課程+沖刺階在線課程+專業(yè)課針對性一對一課程+班主任全程督學服務(wù)+全程規(guī)劃體系+全程測試體系+全程精細化答疑+擇校擇專業(yè)能力定位體系+全年關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié)指導體系+初試加強課+初試專屬服務(wù)+復(fù)試全科標準班服務(wù)

①凡本網(wǎng)注明“稿件來源:跨考網(wǎng)”的所有文字、圖片和音視頻稿件,版權(quán)均屬北京尚學碩博教育咨詢有限公司(含本網(wǎng)和跨考網(wǎng))所有,任何媒體、網(wǎng)站或個人未經(jīng)本網(wǎng)協(xié)議授權(quán)不得轉(zhuǎn)載、鏈接、轉(zhuǎn)帖或以其他任何方式復(fù)制、發(fā)表。已經(jīng)本網(wǎng)協(xié)議授權(quán)的媒體、網(wǎng)站,在下載使用時必須注明“稿件來源,跨考網(wǎng)”,違者本網(wǎng)將依法追究法律責任。

②本網(wǎng)未注明“稿件來源:跨考網(wǎng)”的文/圖等稿件均為轉(zhuǎn)載稿,本網(wǎng)轉(zhuǎn)載僅基于傳遞更多信息之目的,并不意味著再通轉(zhuǎn)載稿的觀點或證實其內(nèi)容的真實性。如其他媒體、網(wǎng)站或個人從本網(wǎng)下載使用,必須保留本網(wǎng)注明的“稿件來源”,并自負版權(quán)等法律責任。如擅自篡改為“稿件來源:跨考網(wǎng)”,本網(wǎng)將依法追究法律責任。

③如本網(wǎng)轉(zhuǎn)載稿涉及版權(quán)等問題,請作者見稿后在兩周內(nèi)速來電與跨考網(wǎng)聯(lián)系,電話:400-883-2220