2014考研英語：閱讀不應丟分題型二_跨考網(wǎng)

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 　　閱讀理解在考研過程中的重要性，我就不再一一贅述。下面要介紹給大家的是閱讀理解中常見的一些不應該丟分的題型，這些題型只要掌握技巧、認真作答就不應該出現(xiàn)錯誤。

　　例證題

　　例證題概述

　　讓事實說話是一種最有效的論證方式，命題組的專家們在設置題目時往往也會針對語篇中的事例設問，考查考生對語篇局部結構的理解。

　　閱讀理解語篇基本上是議論文，說明文。而這類語篇一般都會用例子或事實來說明觀點等話題?？忌陂喿x時對于for example, for instance, such as, as等引出的例子要特別注意，這里就可能是命題的出處。一般來說，例子之前或之后附近通常都有一句總結說明性的話，這句話就可能是答案，即被例證的對象。如果例子與整個語篇相關，即例證主題，答案一般為主題句。當例子與某些段落主題相關，則答案一般為段落主題句。

　　例證題常見的表達方式主要有：

　　1. The author uses the example of … to show that____。

　　2. By citing the example of …, the author intends to show that____。

　　3. The example of … is used to show ____。

　　4. Which of the following is Not an example of …?

　　5. The example of potato chips is used to illustrate____。

　　例題1

　　題目： Why are Arnold Schwarzenegger and Garth Brooks mentioned in Paragraph 5?[考查技能：對相關段落進行語義歸納和判斷。] [命題原則：以點考面]

　　[A] To prove their popularity around the world。

　　[B] To reveal the public’s fear of immigrants。

　　[C] To give examples of successful immigrants。

　　[D] To show the powerful influence of American culture。(2006--24題)

　　原文導讀 Rodriguez notes that children in remote villages around the world are fans of superstars like Arnold Schwarzenegger and Garth Brooks, yet “some Americans fear that immigrants living within the United States remain somehow immune to the nation’s assimilative power?！?/p>

　　Are there divisive issues and pockets of seething anger in America? Indeed. It is big enough to have a bit of everything. But particularly when viewed against America’s turbulent past, today’s social indices hardly suggest a dark and deteriorating social environment。

　　答案分析 本題難度較大，所以我們這里作一個比較詳細的解釋。[A]很容易排除，就不講了。對于[B]選項只要抓住the public 就可以知道絕對不能選。注意原文some Americans fear that immigrants … , “some Americans”(一些美國人)能代表the public(公眾)嗎? 顯然不行，除非是Most Americans在閱讀的替換中可以認為是the public, 命題者在這里是偷換概念，也就是錯誤替換![C] 作者在文章中提到的成功的人物一定是移民嗎?盡管從廣義上來說所有的美國人都是移民。有的考生說施瓦辛格是移民，但考研閱讀不要求考生知道背景，對所有專業(yè)的考生是公平的，即使你沒聽說過他。另外，如果題目舉這兩個人的例子就是為了說明移民本身的成功，那就偏離了文章的主題，

　　大家應該都知道例子是為主題或者主題句服務的。本篇文章討論的主題就是美國在吸收移民方面的成功，美國文化的同化能力很強，本文并不討論移民個人的成功。請注意yet后面的內(nèi)容：然而，一些美國人擔心在美國的移民會不受美國強大的同化能力的影響(有免疫能力)。這句話的內(nèi)涵是什么呢?前半句講了即使美國之外的人也崇拜美國人，那么作者就說了，人們何必擔心住在美國國內(nèi)的移民不受到美國文化的影響呢?言下之意是美國文化在全世界包括美國都有強大的影響。[正確答案][D]

　　例題2

　　題目Which of the following is Not an example of "coded signal" (Line 1, Paragraph 2)?

　　[A] Bees perform dances to convey that the food source is not far away from the hive。

　　[B] Parrots and mynas imitate human speech and whistle when kept in captivity。

　　[C] Huntsmen use horns to indicate the presence of a fox in a field or to call the hunting party together。

　　[D] Bats and dolphins use high frequency sounds for communication and navigation。

　　[原文導讀] Songs can have a powerful effect on people. Play "Gypsies, Tramps and Thieves" to many baby boomers, for example, and chances are they'll run off, hands over their ears. Songs can have a powerful effect among birds, too. Consider the black-capped chickadee. When it sings its "chick-a-dee" song, its flock mates come running. The song is a warning that a hawk, owl or other predator is perched nearby, and the other chickadees arrive to harass the enemy until it leaves。

　　Researchers from the University of Montana have discovered that this warning call is a coded signal. By varying the call, a bird communicates to other birds the size of the predator, and thus the scope of the danger. "This is so far the most finely detailed alarm Call system that were found," said the lead researcher, Christopher N. Templeton, who is now a doctoral student at the University of Washington. The findings appear in the current issue of the journal Science。

　　[答案分析] 本題考查了考生對文中內(nèi)容的理解和演繹推理的能力。coded signal出現(xiàn)在第二段首句，根據(jù)上下文鳥兒的例子可知，它指的是一種用來交流或預警的信號，信號內(nèi)容應是隱藏的，信號方式一般是約定俗成的，不易被其他種類聽懂。依次類推，只有[D]項說明的是動物的模仿能力，不屬于暗號。[正確答案][D]

　　例題3

　　題目 What does the example of New Jerscy (Para. 4) illustrate?

　　[A] Schools in rich districts are usually choosy。

　　[B] Official sources are careful on the success of AC。

　　[C] New Jersey has more need for teachers than elsewhere。

　　[D] AC has turned out good teachers for schools。

　　原文導讀 Are they good teachers? Officialdom is reluctant to release the details which might answer that question for certain. But anecdotal evidence suggests they do well. In New Jersey, which has been running this sort of programme since 1984, rich districts, which can afford to be choosy, consistently hire more AC teachers than poor districts do. In Houston, Texas, where the Teach of America programme (TFA) puts recent university graduates into poor communities as teachers, the most effective teachers are generally the TFA ones. "School principals are our biggest fans," Wendy Kopp, TFA's president, says proudly。

　　答案分析 第四段首句緊接上文提出了Are they(AC recruits)good teachers(他們是好教師嗎?)的疑問。接著該段指出，官員不愿意透露能夠說明問題的具體情況，但是真人真事卻說明這些經(jīng)過AC培訓的教師能夠勝任。緊接著就以新澤西的情況為例加以說明。因此本題答案為[D]項。[A]項是例子中的部分細節(jié)。[B]項是與例子無關的事實。[C]項文中未提。[正確答案][D]

　　最后希望各位考生都能夠掌握閱讀理解的答題技巧，認真?zhèn)淇迹p松過關。跨考教育預祝2014考生們都能夠進入理想的學府。>>>2014考研全年規(guī)劃